Subject:
|
Re: Reconsidering .admin.council group
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Apr 2000 01:08:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
801 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz writes:
> Removing lugnet.admin.council does sound like a good idea, but it might be
> worthwhile to keep the messages and a pointer to them somewhere. There is
> some valuable discussion there, though expressing editorial control over
> what is kept accessible and what is not, is problematical. If a link is just
> put on the lugnet.admin.terms page in the links section, it would be
> accessible, but remove the appearance of being an active part of Lugnet.
I was planning to remove it from the active list of groups, which would mean
that it wouldn't show up in newsreaders or on this old page anymore,
http://www.lugnet.com/news/groups/index/
but all the messages would still appear archived at the website if invoked
via URL -- kinda like the way the .off-topic.qotd messages are still actually
there, and some of the subgroups of .loc.uk.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Reconsidering .admin.council group
|
| Removing lugnet.admin.council does sound like a good idea, but it might be worthwhile to keep the messages and a pointer to them somewhere. There is some valuable discussion there, though expressing editorial control over what is kept accessible and (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
