To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 6457
6456  |  6458
Subject: 
Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 24 Apr 2000 17:04:53 GMT
Viewed: 
5882 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> but I don't feel that I was left much choice, since misinformation was
> being spread.

Oops, wrong word.  It wasn't right to say that "misinformation" was being
spread.  Rather, speculation was being presented which just happened to be
incorrect.  (Big difference!)

--Todd



Message is in Reply To:
  Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) You talk as if you seem to know how much actual time was spent on it. Elapsed time is a crude indicator of development time. (...) Sorry if you feel the password checker is useless. Sorry if you feel inclined to make gross assumptions about (...) (26 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR