Subject:
|
Re: PW validation (was: Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:25:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3002 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> >
> > > having a password validator that doesn't suck is IMHO a fundamental
> > > prerequisite to allowing passwords to be changed. Anything less is
> > > irresponsible.
>
> So are you going to enforce that people HAVE to set their passwords to things
> that the validator feels don't suck, or are you going to give advice but allow
> it anyway?
>
> The former is rather draconian for a site that doesn't handle money. I've
asked
Not to mention that Lugnet != NSA.
KL
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
