General Discussions about LUGNET : 6299


Administrative / General / 6299	6298 \| 6300

Subject:	Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Fri, 21 Apr 2000 13:40:41 GMT
Reply-To:	mattdm@mattdm.NOSPAMorg
Viewed:	2627 times

Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote: > SYMBOL NEW OLD > ++++ 4 80-100 > +++ 3 60-79 > ++ 2 40-59 > + 1 20-39 > 0 0-19 How about +++ 4 ++ 3 + 2 1 0 ? -- Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/ Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
(...) That's probably even better. Gonna try out a related thing first -- changing the "+" symbols to "!" symbols. The "!" symbol is a lot skinnier than "+", so it saves precious space, and the count of symbols isn't really as important anyway as (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
(...) The minus signs still look damaging, and I don't think it's good that a default of 1 (20 internally) can be lowered to 0 by a single person casting a 0. (20+0)/2 = 10, which becomes 0, which becomes "-". Might tweak this tomorrow, either to... (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search