 | | Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | (...) I mainly use the NNTP interface; my perception of the rating system wouldn't change much. (...) This sounds good. Instead of trying to express one's personal feelings publicly but anonymously, a rater's motive would instead be to give feedback (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Hmm, hmm... Very insightfully put. Hadn't looked at it from the point of view of an "anonymous, public reply." Interesting... --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) That could be a great application of a detailed rating system... Multi- dimensional too, not just a single number. (...) In terms of websites, I was thinking more along the lines of you telling the server what types of websites you liked best, (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating) —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | | (...) I don't think you need site ratings to do this. If there was some way for a person (whether the site owner or someone else) to "register" a site with the cool links page, and then fill in a form specifying which themes (not just Lego themes, (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) people. (...) addition (...) What I think would be helpful for this is to come up with a good set of categories (do a fair bit of brainstorming so it doesn't have to be expanded too much later). Then when a (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
