To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 6254
6253  |  6255
Subject: 
Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 20 Apr 2000 23:37:06 GMT
Viewed: 
5790 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
> > 4.  Have you ever felt victimized by the rating system?  Have you posted
> > something which has obtained a low rating and felt uncomfortable or unhappy
> > about yourself or about LUGNET because of the low rating?  How often?
> 
> Yes.  Yes.  If someone disagrees with me and wants to let the world know, I
> at least want to know who said it.  This kind of anonymous, public reply is
> wide open for abuse.

Hmm, hmm...  Very insightfully put.  Hadn't looked at it from the point of
view of an "anonymous, public reply."  Interesting...

--Todd



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) I mainly use the NNTP interface; my perception of the rating system wouldn't change much. (...) This sounds good. Instead of trying to express one's personal feelings publicly but anonymously, a rater's motive would instead be to give feedback (...) (26 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  

309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR