 | | Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) help -- (...) to (...) clear (...) I think the rating system, in a ideal world, is a great idea. However, this is not an ideal world. The trouble with the system is, as I see it, that not enough members are voting - and those who are voting (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | (...) Just for the record.. it isn't me! As in I do rate in loc.uk, but not all of them, and not my own posts :) Richard (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Me neither -- :) -- I try hard not to give opinions on messages in any of the loc groups except ones local to me, or rare cases where someone announced something that was obviously way helpful... There might BTW be some crossposting effects (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Sorry, I did not mean to infer you'd been voting on your own posts - although I'm sure you do value your own opinion :-) I just assumed that as the total number of votes were so low, that only one person was activley doing it - and I know you (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | |
