To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.ukOpen lugnet.loc.uk in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / United Kingdom / 3677
3676  |  3678
Subject: 
Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.loc.uk
Date: 
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:57:56 GMT
Viewed: 
2099 times
  
In lugnet.loc.uk, Richard Franks writes:
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:

BTW : I reckon that on loc.uk there is only one person voting (I expect it
is RF?). This means that anyone glancing at this group a few years down the
line will be using that single opinion as a guide. As much as I respect RF,
nobody could argue that is ideal.

Just for the record.. it isn't me!  As in I do rate in loc.uk, but not all of
them, and not my own posts :)


Sorry, I did not mean to infer you'd been voting on your own posts - although
I'm sure you do value your own opinion :-)

I just assumed that as the total number of votes were so low, that only one
person was activley doing it - and I know you do vote.

Enjoy Easter

Scott A


Richard



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Just for the record.. it isn't me! As in I do rate in loc.uk, but not all of them, and not my own posts :) Richard (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.uk)

309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR