 | | Re: the latest news —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) I admit I do a lot of rating, I've switched over to the web interface for the most part, partly because I had to and partly because I want to rate and see ratings. Despite that, I share some of Thomas's misgivings. I know that there are people (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
| | | | | | | | | | Re: the latest news —Tom McDonald
| | | | | (...) For a few days I was thinking that too. But then I realized "I don't care," and also "I have no idea who rated this" -- they could be out to lunch for all I know, either for the duration of rating my article, or permanently. Or they could be (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: the latest news —Shiri Dori
| | | | | (...) Short note: in the temporary "top 40" page Todd put up, at least 50% (if not more, I didn't count) of the posts were related to the discussion about the rating. That's too bad, because it shouldn't be (AFAI gathered from Todd's POV on what (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: the latest news —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) Except for the fact that the message-group filter isn't applied there, it's actually working perfectly well, IMHO. The ratings are, in the final analysis, recommendations-to-read. If the original message and its replies are getting high (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
