 | | Re: location of NQC group? —Dave Baum
| | | | (...) Yes, I think that would be a good move. (...) I'd prefer not to proliferate too many newsgropus. Personally I don't think the nqc traffic is presently so high that people need to filter it based on target. Odds are that this would even cause a (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: location of NQC group? —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) Safest thing is a multi-step process: 1. Announce that a new group/list lugnet.robotics.nqc will soon be replacing lugnet.robotics.nqc (i.e., a "heads-up"). 2. [A day or so later] Create lugnet.robotics.nqc and associated web areas and mailing (...) (25 years ago, 9-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: location of NQC group? —Dave Baum
| | | | | In article <Fsr8BC.L5q@lugnet.com>, Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote: <massive snip> (...) Sounds great. Dave Baum (25 years ago, 9-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
