| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin Salm writes:
> As for value to the community, I have to disagree with the statement someone
> made that .test messages have no value.
I agree, Kevin. I love .test... just as an example, I never would've
discovered the <set:xxx> and <part:yyy> if not for reading that group. (OK
probably I would've discvered them eventually but I found out early this way :)
> I personally have seen some good
> things get discovered in .test. And sometimes conversations do occur in that
> group, albeit mostly meaningless. I do not frequent .test myself, but have in
> the past. I do like to check in every now and then to see how many times Todd
> used the words Foo and glorp, etc. in a single test message or group of them.
LOL... I like to frequent there just to see what people come up with. It's
very amusing and interesting at times.
-Shiri
>
> __Kevin Salm__
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Message rating again
|
| (...) Yes, you are correct. Test messages do not participate in searches; not even searches on the web test page. That search box is simply there by default but can serve no purpose other than consistency among lugnet page displays. If anyone really (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
