(...) Nope, not correct. If we were less sure, we'd say so. (We -could- of course end up being wrong, and I'm not saying that we're necessarily right -- and I actually in fact hope that we're wrong (because they look like great models) -- but the (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
(...) See, I *told* you you'd say that. You can't say anything else and stick to the story that you believe it's a hoax for plausible deniability reasons. ++Lar (24 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
