 | | Re: Is there a right or wrong way to use the vote?
|
|
(...) Excellent points. Based on what I am seeing in a different thread right in this very same group, I am already a bit concerned. Someone went through and rated posts clearly by whether that person agreed or disagreed. (...) I agree. BTW, I rated (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a right or wrong way to use the vote?
|
|
(...) If you're talking about the initial "New Feature" thread, with someone using the '30' and '80' midpoints, then that might be me. I welcome any comments on whether this is distasteful or not - I wasn't entirely sure, but I thought I'd show (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a right or wrong way to use the vote?
|
|
(...) An 83, how did you do that? The API of the process which accepts rating input is perfectly happy to take other numbers in 0-100 besides multiples of 10, but have you already written something to give finer-tuned ratings than the 11 defaults (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a right or wrong way to use the vote?
|
|
(...) Silly me - the 'agree' and 'disagree' midpoints are actually 20 and 80 (if they have any use anyway!). Richard (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a right or wrong way to use the vote?
|
|
(...) No silly, although that's an interesting idea. It was just a takeoff on the american bandstand show and I typed the first number that came into my head. You must be young, I thought the "it's got a good beat" was a dead giveaway line ++Lar (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
