 | | Ratings?
|
|
What's this rating thing that just appeared? Alan (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Feelings (was: Re: Ratings?)
|
|
I think it is important (or soon will be) to create a culture where rating != status - that is, if you have a message that's been marked down.. you don't feel rejected _at_all_. I feel kinda silly admitting this, but for the purposes of the (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Feelings (was: Re: Ratings?)
|
|
(...) On the other hand, it may be a problem that will "grow-away" by itself(1), people will generally get a mix of high and low scores.. and when seeing and getting a true mix of scoring is common, it probably won't be as traumatic (if at all!). (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Feelings (was: Re: Ratings?)
|
|
(...) Actually 32 seconds-but who cares? I hadn't seen Todd's post when I posted this. No, it doesn't make me feel bad having a 17 since it is unimportant after Todd's post. Alan (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Feelings (was: Re: Ratings?)
|
|
(...) Well, since I think we can be expecting a few new features in the next few months it may be proper to simply wait for an initial announcement before making a public inquiry. Even with all of the testing that I am sure Todd performs, it may be (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Feelings (was: Re: Ratings?)
|
|
This is very true. For example... consider this article: (URL) I thinskinned, I'd think that someone was pretty amused by my being ripped on, they gave it a 90, (net 70) and gave my own a what, 60 (net 55)? probably at this point with just one (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
