| | Re: CFD: rec.toys.lego feed here Sarah Heacock
|
| | (...) You can't do this. It's unethical to cancel someone else's post when it is not spam. Even if they happen to have cross-posted to lugnet.(something) I'd say the best option is to ignore it. If you see one cross-posted, and you want to, send a (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: CFD: rec.toys.lego feed here Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Heh heh, I know. :) I wouldn't do it; it was just there for completness. (...) Well, I guess half for the reasons you brought up last week about what's been happening to sff.* groups, and half because of confusions that will inevitably arise. (...) (26 years ago, 27-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CFD: rec.toys.lego feed here Sarah Heacock
|
| | | | (...) But you already don't let EVERY message posted here show up here. If the person is not registered. And if they are registered, then they should know how to post, right? (Ie, go to news.lugnet.com -- or whatever the name is here.) Maybe I'm (...) (26 years ago, 27-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CFD: rec.toys.lego feed here Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Erm, no, you're right -- as usual. :) My bad. --Todd (26 years ago, 27-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CFD: rec.toys.lego feed here Sarah Heacock
|
| | | | (...) {______} I would not go THAT far! Sarah (26 years ago, 27-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |