Subject:
|
Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Mar 2000 00:16:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1636 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes:
> > Wondering what the numbers are for Netscape-branded browsers, or
> > Opera, Be's thing, Lynx, etc...
>
> I forget what the numbers were for yesterday but they were very sad.
Here are some numbers from 77 days (11 weeks) of HTTP logs... DYOC, but it
looks to me like Microsoft is winning.
--Todd
_______________________________________________________________________________
13833968 HTTP requests - 1 Jan 2000 through 17 Mar 2000 - www.lugnet.com
Notes:
1. The browser brands below are what was reported as the HTTP user agent.
MSIE, MSPIE, and Opera identify themselves as "Mozilla compatible" and
this is taken into account. Any other non-Mozilla agents identifying
themselves as "Mozilla compatible" are lumped into "Other."
2. The numbers below represent simple raw HTTP hits, not page views or
unique users. Thus, for example, since Lynx is a text browser, it
requests fewer URLs than GUI browsers request.
By Browser Brand...
0.216908% Lynx
35.822556% Mozilla (Netscape Navigator & Mozilla)
58.662135% MSIE (MicroSoft Internet Explorer)
0.002140% MSPIE (MicroSoft Pocket Internet Explorer)
0.303586% Opera
4.992675% (Other)
-----------
100%
By Browser Brand & Major Version...
0.216944% Lynx 2*
0.000116% Mozilla 0*
0.000275% Mozilla 1*
0.259058% Mozilla 2*
1.626627% Mozilla 3*
33.903888% Mozilla 4* <--
0.032832% Mozilla 5*
0.000781% Mozilla 7*
0.000007% Mozilla 8*
0.000383% MSIE 0*
0.560642% MSIE 2*
1.166332% MSIE 3*
19.154049% MSIE 4* <--
37.780679% MSIE 5* <--
0.000051% MSIE 7*
0.002075% MSPIE 1*
0.000065% MSPIE 2*
0.303586% Opera 3*
4.992675% (Other)
-----------
100%
By Browser Brand & Major Version & Minor Version...
0.000441% Lynx 2.7
0.001243% Lynx 2.7.1
0.002610% Lynx 2.7.2
0.015585% Lynx 2.8
0.178720% Lynx 2.8.1
0.017659% Lynx 2.8.2
0.000614% Lynx 2.8.3
0.000116% Mozilla 0.9
0.000029% Mozilla 1.1
0.000130% Mozilla 1.12
0.000116% Mozilla 1.22
0.021707% Mozilla 2.0
0.111277% Mozilla 2.01
0.126074% Mozilla 2.02
0.445664% Mozilla 3.0
0.750963% Mozilla 3.01
0.021129% Mozilla 3.02
0.032362% Mozilla 3.03
0.374802% Mozilla 3.04
0.028531% Mozilla 4.0
0.000441% Mozilla 4.00
0.097188% Mozilla 4.01
0.244969% Mozilla 4.02
0.341066% Mozilla 4.03
1.622058% Mozilla 4.04
1.461779% Mozilla 4.05
0.906566% Mozilla 4.06
0.553984% Mozilla 4.07
2.093427% Mozilla 4.08
5.342907% Mozilla 4.5
1.911664% Mozilla 4.51
2.160674% Mozilla 4.6
5.460096% Mozilla 4.61
0.000434% Mozilla 4.666
11.264780% Mozilla 4.7 <--
0.092663% Mozilla 4.71
0.320313% Mozilla 4.72
0.032832% Mozilla 5.0
0.000781% Mozilla 7.06
0.000007% Mozilla 8.0
0.000383% MSIE 0.1
0.550233% MSIE 2.0
0.010409% MSIE 2.1
0.322865% MSIE 3.0
0.000983% MSIE 3.0.1
0.280968% MSIE 3.01
0.560237% MSIE 3.02
0.001279% MSIE 3.03
0.641616% MSIE 4.0
17.472442% MSIE 4.01 <--
0.000043% MSIE 4.1
1.039947% MSIE 4.5
29.137728% MSIE 5.0 <--
0.000260% MSIE 5.00
8.350800% MSIE 5.01
0.291890% MSIE 5.5
0.000051% MSIE 7.0
0.002075% MSPIE 1.1
0.000065% MSPIE 2.0
0.001251% Opera 3.0
0.206983% Opera 3.60
0.052263% Opera 3.61
0.043090% Opera 3.62
4.992675% (Other)
----------
100%
[end]
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
| (...) Good question. Over a short period of time (such as a day) I think the proxy servers at big places like AOL end up drawfing the "dialup double-ups." But that's just a hunch. BTW, in the past 2 weeks, one single IP address (of the zillions that (...) (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
