Subject:
|
Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Mar 2000 05:25:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1613 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> > I titled the subject "Why MSIE sucks for the HTML *writer*" not "Why MSIE
> > sucks for the user".
>
> I should have titled the subject, "Why I continue to be frustrated with MSIE
> as much as I ever have been, while others continue to be progressively less
> frustrated with MSIE."
<grin> Do you mean that other people have moved to newer versions, but you
still have to be in sync with older ones?
> Or maybe just kept it to myself.
Maybe... <grin again>
-Shiri
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
| (...) Yes, partially that. But I still prefer Mozilla 4.7 (a.k.a. Netscape Navigator 4.7) and the Milestone versions of Mozilla 5 over any MSIE, just on principle. Plus, MS hasn't even released MSIE for my operating system, so I couldn't run it on (...) (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
| (...) I should have titled the subject, "Why I continue to be frustrated with MSIE as much as I ever have been, while others continue to be progressively less frustrated with MSIE." Or maybe just kept it to myself. --Todd (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
