 | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
|
|
(...) No it doesn't. But meanwhile 11 people have participated in this thread. Except for you, Scott, who came up with the idea, not one person is in favor for it. Sure, 10 people don't represent the whole community. But show me one other person (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
|
|
"Shiri Dori" <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Fr2BII.J3z@lugnet.com... (...) and (...) announcements (...) them (...) favor (...) my (...) this (...) Sure. But sometimes it is difficult to change. Using this form of debate, it can be (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
|
|
(...) Actually, it's still a bad idea even if 90% (or 98%) of people wanted it, because it would alienate the last 10% (or 2%). That's not what kind of ship we're sailing here. The theme discussion groups are for discussions, not commerce. Nobody is (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
|
|
(...) this (...) Actually, I suspect it has aliented or could alienate some people (a few names pop to mind(1)), but I would posit that those people are for the most part interested in bang for their buck, and not in discussion, so would generally (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
|
|
(...) Speaking as a buyer, this would be a convenience for me. There you go. However it's a bad idea anyway. That, I feel, does NOT contradict referencing auctions for valid reasons NOT related to promoting the auction itself, which I support (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
