Subject:
|
Re: themed-group charters
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 10:37:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
215 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Todd Lehman (<Fr10vA.7Ex@lugnet.com>) wrote at
00:47:34
> In lugnet.admin.council, Tony Priestman writes:
> > > I can see how the rationale might be amusing from a historical perspective.
> > > How would they help anyone in the present?
> >
> > Because it shows what the group is for. It provides guidance as to what
> > .castle is about.
>
> You mean it's not obvious that lugnet.castle is for focused discussions about
> Castle stuff (and in particular the LEGO Castle product line)?
Yes, it is obvious that it's about Castle stuff, but if I was only
interested in Castle, and I'd gone straight there, I might have missed
some of the more general background info about lugnet. I guess I'm
asking for some redundancy, to cut newbies some slack. The more obvious
the framework is, the easier it is to keep within it.
>
> (What am I missing the gist of here?)
>
> Could you suggest a (reasonably brief) template for all of the themed-groups
> (not just .castle) to replace the current charters with?
Yes, I was just using castle as an example. I'll give it a go, but need
to think about it.
--
Tony Priestman
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
