 | | Re: Article scoring
|
| (...) You mean a positive-feedback loop producing progressively higher and higher values for popular articles? That's what the sqrt() function is for -- to dampen by applying a nonlinear but still monotonically increasing function to the divisor. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Article scoring
|
| (...) No, I think he means: create a place where the most positive-feedback messages of the day/week/time unit are displayed, so that people don't have to read all the letters and check each scoring individually, but find all the 'popular' messages (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Article scoring
|
| (...) Wait, are you talking now about the slope of the function or the value of the function? I thought Richard was asking if having a "Top X" list sorted by the value of the scoring function (not its slope or second derivative, which would have (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Article scoring
|
| (...) Oh-- OH! ... that makes it clearer. I was thrown off by Richard's first sentence - "Sounds Funky! Wouldn't it be nice to have..." (...) I agree. It all depends on people's range of interest. I mean, if 100 people responded in a +1 feedback to (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Article scoring
|
| (...) Ah - yep I understood the sqrt part. What I meant is that creating a list of the most popular messages skews the vote - because the most votes will end up being put on items on the list, only because people use the list to browse. From a (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Article scoring
|
| (...) I almost get what you're getting at, but I'm stuck on one part of it. In the early stages of an article's appearance, let's say it's position 19 out of 20 on a top-20 page, and let's say only 7 people have voted +1 on it so far. Should it, in (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Article scoring
|
| (...) I'm not sure if referenced votes *should* be weighted differently, I just thought I'd throw it in :) Hmm.. if you did weight top-20 page posts differently, then *really* cool posts in low-traffic groups would still get ignored.. unless you (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
