| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> Mike & Frank & Todd,
>
> I suppose the problem is that I'm lazy - some extra words or separate posts
> were required in retrospect. But please do not assume any deliberate deceit
> was intended. I'm just a man of few words that it all.
Well, you don't have to prove anything to me, first of all. I gave an honest
opinion/interpretation of your first post, and pointed out that it didn't
convey what you thought it conveyed.
I don't perceive any particular deceitfulness or maliciousness in the act,
like I said, you don't have to prove anything to me.
I don't see writing it off to laziness as the answer, but again, that's just
my opinion. "I'm lazy" sounds like an excuse, and I don't think Todd wants an
excuse.
You're a smart guy, do what Larry said - agree to NOT be lazy and agree to
keep auction-related stuff only in bst, and agree that should you choose to be
lazy and do a bad thing again, you'll accept being banned from bst for good
without complaint.
I happen to think posting a list of sets/parts/items on a page, with specific
prices, or maybe even "make offer" with an indication that anything not sold
through straight-sale method would at a later time be auctioned off is
perfectly legitimate. I'm doing the same thing myself right now, just not
publicly. But were I to post something like that publicly in bst, I'd make
double-sure it was clear I was looking purely to sell at this time, with the
option to auction if things weren't snatched up. But I'd keep auction-
specific info out of it.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
110 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
