 | | Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
|
| (...) I'd prefer a standard representation, something like: <set:344> or [set:8448] This would avoid false positives. And there _are_ three digit set numbers. (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
|
| (...) The only two problems with a new representation: First, older posts wouldn't work - why leave them out? Second, people wouldn't do the extra typing. Right now they could refer to every set as a link, (for example, (URL) ), but very few people (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
