Subject:
|
Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 04:10:14 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm&saynotospam&.org
|
Viewed:
|
105 times
|
| |
|
|
David Schilling <davidNO@SPAMsunteleia.com> wrote:
> out links and makes these clickable. It should be reasonably easy to also
> look for four digit numbers and if they correspond to a set, make that a link
>
> How about it? Anybody else interested in this?
I'd prefer a standard representation, something like:
<set:344>
or
[set:8448]
This would avoid false positives. And there _are_ three digit set numbers.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
|
| (...) The only two problems with a new representation: First, older posts wouldn't work - why leave them out? Second, people wouldn't do the extra typing. Right now they could refer to every set as a link, (for example, (URL) ), but very few people (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
