Subject:
|
Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Dec 1999 14:12:53 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.!spamcake!com
|
Viewed:
|
169 times
|
| |
|
|
I don't know if you intended to ask just Brad or all of us...
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> In lugnet.dear-lego, admin@lugnet.com (Todd Lehman) writes:
> > [...]
> > Reformatting lugnet.dear-lego (by retroactively altering its charter) sounds
> > like a great idea to me (and to Suzanne). Anyone have any objections to
> > that?
My thinking on a reformat is, can you start over? Move the current
dear-lego to dear-lego-old. If you keep the current contents, someone
starting at the beginning, reading with the current charter in mind, is
going to be confused. Those appends should be kept for historical
purposes but should not be in the current group with the current
charter... if you see what I mean.
I agree, dear-lego is a good name for the group.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) I was going to write about this, but I see you've voiced my concerns near-perfectly. I agree that dear-lego is quite a good name, but IMHO retroactively altering things, especially as important as group charters, is Evil. Moving the current (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
