| |
Simon Robinson wrote:
> Actually I'm sure I won't be the first to point out that
> 100 years/6 hours = a very BIG number. Not allowing for leap years
> I make it 146 000. Perhaps you mean the other way round? <g>
You actually were the first... so yes, and no. Because while it appears
that might have been what I wrote, clearly, it can't actually be,
because that would be a misteak. And I don't make those. Ask anyone.
So it was that pesky old reality distortion field thing again.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
23 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
