 | | Re: Charters for product-line/themed groups clarified
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:382212a3.591440...net.com... (...) Hey, what happened to Star Wars "fanaticism" as referenced in the earlier charter for lugnet.starwars? That was my favorite part of the charter. Can we please (...) (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Charters for product-line/themed groups clarified
|
|
(...) I thought that'd be covered under the other stuff, but I'll add it back in explicitly. In fact, how does "unabashed Star Wars fanaticism" sound? :) --Todd (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Charters for product-line/themed groups clarified
|
|
(...) But Todd, some of us *like* bashing Star Wars fanatics... <grin, duck> James (URL) (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Charters for product-line/themed groups clarified
|
|
(...) How about "Star Wars lunacy"? or "Things you never new about Star Wars that I just made up to make you watch the moives again for the 10,293 time" or even "Debates on whether LEGO will ever make Princes Leia in the Jaba slave outfit". :-) . (...) (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Charters for product-line/themed groups clarified
|
|
(...) Nah, "fanaticism" does just fine. It's a word who's sound understates the extent of its meaning. Hmm. . . Lunatic-->Lunacy, Idiot-->Idiocy, Fanatic-->why not Fanatacy? Good night, all. -John Van (25 years ago, 6-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
