 | | Re: CFD: lugnet.announce —Paul Gyugyi
|
| | | (...) Agreed! It has been my experience that *.announce groups are low-volume, moderated groups with almost no "discussion" going on, and that's why I subscribe to them. -gyug (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: CFD: lugnet.announce —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Todd, I'd agree that this is generally a normal assumption. But I still see the use for a general announcement group, and lugnet.announce sure seems like the intuitive name for that too. How about making lugnet.announce such that "Followup-To" (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CFD: lugnet.announce —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I like that. I bet it would go a long ways toward keeping newbies from posting non-announcements there too. Probably pretty easy to add to the injection stuff. Sounds like a good second thing to try before resorting to more stuff. (The first (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
