To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 2643
2642  |  2644
Subject: 
Re: Sig a probational condition?, philosophy of what we are doing (was Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 19 Aug 1999 02:45:38 GMT
Viewed: 
427 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <37BB20F7.439C93D1@voyager.net>...
*snip*
Getting such a CFV right is not easy and I don't think any swipes at
Adam for trying to take this task on, but not getting it right the first
time, are warranted. Rather, a vote of thanks, but with a request to try
again, is in order. (so moved, do I have a second?)


Seconded.

*snip*
To those that say we are overanalysing... we are. But that's OK. We MUST
get this right, be precise, and be impartial or we will have sown the
seeds of the destruction of our community.

"What is fair" can be ambiguous, but justice itself must be impartial,
emotionless, and unambiguous, or it is unfair on the face of it. Life
isn't fair but I'd prefer we act as fairly as we can under the
circumstances.


Hear Hear.

Frank



Message is in Reply To:
  Sig a probational condition?, philosophy of what we are doing (was Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
 
I just reviewed this subthread's responses and I didn't see a single person, so far, who felt that use of a sig was mandatory, so I'm not sure I'd either - be all that upset about it the larger scheme of things... or - make it be one of the terms of (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR