To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 2561
  Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
 
(...) These are three separate questions, right? Not mutually exclusive alternatives? Until reading TimC's message, (URL) had thought the votes were going to look like this (for example): a. All lugnet.* groups ==> No b. Just lugnet.cad.* groups ==> (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
 
(...) I voted as Todd indicated, where (a), (b) and (c) are each separate points. Perhaps the organization of questions could have been better. Just given either (a) or (b) above, I saw that just by answering yes on (b) would mean redundancy if my (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
 
(...) Ahh, but #2 and #5 do achieve different results! In #2, the hope is that if (a) doesn't pass, then perhaps (b) or (c) still might. In #3, if (a) doesn't pass, then that's it...all or nothing. * In #2, you're saying, "Yes, I would personally (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
 
(...) Yeah, now that you splained it, it does! But it did need splaining then. You definitely were right to ask. And now, maybe I should recall my vote and alter it before it's too late. I *can* do that right? (...) But even if #3 is adopted, all it (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
 
(...) OK, then why was voting the "should XYZ happen" conditional upon the response to the "personally be happier if XYZ"? Steve (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR