General Discussions about LUGNET : 2561


Administrative / General / 2561	2560 \| 2562

Subject:	Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Tue, 17 Aug 1999 22:11:51 GMT
Viewed:	332 times

In lugnet.cad.dev, "Adam Howard" <abhoward10@hotmail.com> writes: > [...] > Extreme measures: > 1. Would you personally enjoy the lugnet groups more if Jonathan Wilson's > posting privileges were revoked from: > a. All lugnet.* groups > b. Just lugnet.cad.* groups > c. Other (please list) These are three separate questions, right? Not mutually exclusive alternatives? Until reading TimC's message, http://www.lugnet.com/cad/dev/?n=2669 I had thought the votes were going to look like this (for example): a. All lugnet.* groups ==> No b. Just lugnet.cad.* groups ==> Yes c. Other (please list) ==> Yes: .starwars a. All lugnet.* groups ==> Yes b. Just lugnet.cad.* groups ==> Yes c. Other (please list) ==> Yes: .starwars, .general a. All lugnet.* groups ==> No b. Just lugnet.cad.* groups ==> No c. Other (please list) ==> No a. All lugnet.* groups ==> No b. Just lugnet.cad.* groups ==> No c. Other (please list) ==> Yes: .cad.dev.*, .cad.dat.parts.* a. All lugnet.* groups ==> Yes b. Just lugnet.cad.* groups ==> No c. Other (please list) ==> No (In the last example, this would be a vote by someone who wanted it to be all or nothing.) I see no simple and objective way to interpret the results unless each of (a), (b), and (c) are separate sub-questions each with its own answer.[1] Confused, --Todd [1] Except in the special case where (a) alone comes out 2/3 or higher.

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
(...) I voted as Todd indicated, where (a), (b) and (c) are each separate points. Perhaps the organization of questions could have been better. Just given either (a) or (b) above, I saw that just by answering yes on (b) would mean redundancy if my (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
Followup-To: lugnet.admin.general This is a Call For Votes (CFV) After much discussion it has been decided that an open public vote needs to be made about this situation. The vote is at the end of this message. Please read the Problem Summary and (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search