Subject:
|
Re: i admit i was wrong
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 15 Aug 1999 23:45:45 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera%AvoidSpam%.com
|
Viewed:
|
170 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> Spam0man said:
> > Has the golden ratio been established yet? This would more than likely set a
> > precedent for how future ostracising is determined.
>
> Hehheh. Sure, heck, why not 8/13 or 34/55? ;-)
>
> But seriously: Cool and fun the golden ratio may be, but only 61.8% it is.
> (Er, 1/phi is 61.8%, that is; phi itself is 1.618... Anyway.)
He trolled you (1). He doesn't really mean 1/phi, he is asking what the
right ratio should be in this case.... me, I think 5/7ths isn't too bad!
It has a good feel to it.
>
> 61.8% is more than 1/2, obviously, and more 3/5, but it's less than 2/3.
> Isn't that a bit too small?
Yes, 61.8 is too small.
1 - or maybe YOU trolled ME? Who can say? Maybe I was AUTO-trolling.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
| (...) hehe (...) Yup. Gotta love those lower prime numbers :-) (...) Definitely too small. (...) I was fishing for salmon and caught a sturgeon instead! No troll intended, I plainly used an ambiguous term (see a prior post from me on Part One of (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
