To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 2503
2502  |  2504
Subject: 
Re: i admit i was wrong
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sun, 15 Aug 1999 23:45:45 GMT
Reply-To: 
LPIENIAZEK@NOVERA.COMstopspammers
Viewed: 
179 times
  
Todd Lehman wrote:
Spam0man said:
Has the golden ratio been established yet? This would more than likely set a
precedent for how future ostracising is determined.

Hehheh.  Sure, heck, why not 8/13 or 34/55?  ;-)

But seriously:  Cool and fun the golden ratio may be, but only 61.8% it is.
(Er, 1/phi is 61.8%, that is; phi itself is 1.618...  Anyway.)

He trolled you (1). He doesn't really mean 1/phi, he is asking what the
right ratio should be in this case.... me, I think 5/7ths isn't too bad!
It has a good feel to it.


61.8% is more than 1/2, obviously, and more 3/5, but it's less than 2/3.
Isn't that a bit too small?

Yes, 61.8 is too small.

1 - or maybe YOU trolled ME? Who can say? Maybe I was AUTO-trolling.

--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com  http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.

NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: i admit i was wrong
 
(...) hehe (...) Yup. Gotta love those lower prime numbers :-) (...) Definitely too small. (...) I was fishing for salmon and caught a sturgeon instead! No troll intended, I plainly used an ambiguous term (see a prior post from me on Part One of (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR