 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Ed Jones
|
| | | (...) Well, I wouldn't call it a mountain, maybe a trash heap. :') But is it just me, or is this whole clamoring for "prime" numbers getting just a little out of hand. Who was the first to post? Who helped Todd the most? Yada Yada Yada Yada. Folks, (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) No, that's right. If people get the number they want, that's really great. But if they don't, I don't really care (much). But I *do* care (a lot) that people be given the choice to -avoid- certain numbers that they don't want. That is, I would (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Sanjay D'Souza
|
| | | | | | A far easier numbering system would be to use segments, ie an ID could be made up of subparts that could be used for future Lugnet marketing purposes, give aways and localised promotions. For instance the segments could include: Country of Origin, (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | (...) Thanks for your MasterCard # Sanjay! :D (...) You mean some sort of unique integer based on the attributes of someone's profile? I could see that, but having considered this idea in my only real job- related database project of music involving (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Sanjay D'Souza
|
| | | | I agree with Ed on this one....if people start using arguments like who posted the first post or who argued the first argument or who boobed with the first blooper then things will really get out of hand. An easier option, one that will guarantee to (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
