Subject:
|
Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Jul 1999 01:22:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
541 times
|
| |
|
|
I agree with Ed on this one....if people start using arguments like who
posted the first post or who argued the first argument or who boobed with
the first blooper then things will really get out of hand.
An easier option, one that will guarantee to sort out the faithful from the
pretentious is to have a public flogging of all those who want "hard to get"
numbers. If those people last the distance then clearly they deserve the
numbers they seek. If they don't last then perhaps their collections can be
donated to Lugnet Corporation.
Sanjay
(TIC of course)
Ed Jones wrote in message ...
> But is it just me, or is this whole clamoring for "prime" numbers getting • just
> a little out of hand. Who was the first to post? Who helped Todd the • most?
> Yada Yada Yada Yada.
>
> Folks, he's trying to run a service here, not immoratalize those who would • be
> immortalized. I can see it now: "but in deja news it shows my post was • before
> your posts so I should have gotten a lower number". "Yeah but I gave him
> advice on widgey widges that he's using to run LUGNET so I should have a • lower
> number"
>
> Todd, I could be wrong, but you could be opening up a whole can of • kvetching
> here. I really don't think you started LUGNET to referee a fight for the • low
> numbers.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
| (...) Well, I wouldn't call it a mountain, maybe a trash heap. :') But is it just me, or is this whole clamoring for "prime" numbers getting just a little out of hand. Who was the first to post? Who helped Todd the most? Yada Yada Yada Yada. Folks, (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
