Subject:
|
Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 4 Jul 1999 05:33:23 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjc@newsguy.*saynotospam*com
|
Viewed:
|
1078 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> p.s. Many many thanks to Larry and Mike and Sarah and others who
> volunteered their time in August of last summer to help test the intial
> setups, which proved that it all would be possible and workable.
Yeah, well, I still want 69. <g>
Barring that, I'd like the number I'd get according to the order
people began posting to Lugnet, which I would imagine would be
somewhere less than 20, maybe even less than 10.
Lugnet IS new, and just like I don't think of Lugnet as an extension
of the pile of sludge that is RTL now, I don't really think of it as
something that owes its existence to RTL. Given that, tying numbers
(if you aren't going to go random or sequential with respect to Lugnet
postings/joinings) to old-time RTL/ATL posting seems a little silly.
I'd be more likely to see the proposal Ed had as "fair" than anything
else, if it isn't going to be an internal Lugnet-related thing.
--
The parts you want and nothing else?
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
Lego Shop at Home: 800-835-4386 (USA) / 800-267-5346 (Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - A great new resource for LEGO fans worldwide
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
| (...) Heh heh. OK, here's the fully story... Larry had a *very* positive impact, to be sure. Very important and helpful discussion. It's what he does for a living, too, basically (or did, I'm not sure). Anyway, I remember writing Larry afterwards (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
