Subject:
|
Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 3 Jul 1999 04:13:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
981 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 3 Jul 1999 00:19:49 GMT, "Christopher L. Weeks"
<c576653@cclabs.missouri.edu> wrote:
> Todd Lehman wrote:
> >
> >
> > Does that sound like the fairest way?
> >
> > --Todd
>
> Why are lowest numbers tied to history on the on-line LEGO community
> anyway? I mean why RTL, ATL? I think of LUGNET as a phoenix of sorts,
> with a fresh new beginning. Why not just assign them serially to people
> important to LUGNET and forget about the olden days of ATL? You and the
> people who help out should get numbers, then maybe major posters in the
> newsgroups - from the past year (like the top 20% of posters or
> something), and then
> members as people sign up.
>
> Or an auction is a cool idea too.
Why not just make this whole thing moot and just assign numbers in a random or
pseudo-random lottery? Have each person apply for a number, and have a server
doohicky spit out a random number from an available pool.
I think we're attaching far too much importance to these numbers.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
| (...) Well, if they're still generally increasing slowly and the randomness comes from a small pool of lowest-available numbers rather than a large pool of, say, 32-bit integers, then that would certainly work too. (...) This is something I've been (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
| (...) Why are lowest numbers tied to history on the on-line LEGO community anyway? I mean why RTL, ATL? I think of LUGNET as a phoenix of sorts, with a fresh new beginning. Why not just assign them serially to people important to LUGNET and forget (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
