 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Michael Cortez
|
| | | (...) I like the idea of auctioning them off. Set the start price at $0.00 for each number, if no one counterbids within say a week they get the number. All numbers withing the range the database can handle are open from day one. So if you want a (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) As long as they weren't fixed-end-point auctions, right? :-) (26 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Richard Dee
|
| | | | On Fri, 2 Jul 1999 03:37:55 GMT, Michael Cortez uttered the following profundities... (...) Give any proceeds to a children's charity, perhaps. One whose focus might involve the constructive and educational benefits of Lego. (26 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) That might be an admirable goal at some time in the future, but one of the goals that some of us have right now is to make sure Lugnet becomes a self-supporting venture so Todd and Suz can keep doing it and we can keep enjoying it. So I'd say (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
