 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Mike Walsh
|
| | | How about letting people get a member number based on their favorite LEGO set. Although I am sure that certain numbers (4558, 6399, etc.) would be much sought after. You could auction them off to raise money for LUGNET. This method would be (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Derek Schin
|
| | | | Mike Walsh wrote in message ... (...) I love this idea. And you can combine it with the old-timer privelidge--if multiple people want the same number, it goes to the oldest R(or A)TLer. And if someone pisses you off, you can assign them a Time (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) I wonder how (technically) you would really settle any disputes over who was "older." Maybe you'd have to let each party find (on their own) and demonstrate their oldest post. But someone may have lurked for 6 months and participated privately (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Richard Dee
|
| | | | On Fri, 2 Jul 1999 02:10:37 GMT, Derek Schin uttered the following profundities... (...) There can be only one....number one. Todd! (26 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
