Subject:
|
Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Jul 1999 00:26:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
858 times
|
| |
|
|
You could end up with a bidding war similar to personalised car licence
plates.
Numbers like 1, 13 and dare I say it 69 may raise a lot of interest. Then
again this could be a good thing if people are prepared to pay for these
numbers via an auction and thus become a good money earner for Lugnet
Corporation.
Whether this would result in a thriving black market in "Lugnet ID Numbers"
would remain to be seen. For instance, Wes De Beer could successfully bid
US$231 on ID number 1 then sell it a year later to say Eve Asian for US$541.
Whether Todd would be happy with this is unknown but a lot of people could
stand to make a lot of money if the whole situation isn't handled properly.
Sanjay
<Tougue firmly in cheek for the duration of this post>
"If you don't have a sense of humour you don't have any sense"
Todd Lehman wrote in message <377be037.91385342@lugnet.com>...
>
> Any opinions on how LUGNET member #'s should be allocated/assigned?
>
> Here are some possibilities:
>
> - One possibility is simply to start at 1 and count upward on a first-
> come, first-serve basis, one number at a time. (I think this might
> be what ICQ does...?) Whatever number ya get, ya got, and that's that.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
| (...) LOL! :) BTW, I realize from your final paragraph that you weren't 100% serious, but it's worth reiterating something anyway for anyone following along... The ID#'s won't be transferrable, so whatever number you pick is with you for life. In (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
| (...) I like the idea of auctioning them off. Set the start price at $0.00 for each number, if no one counterbids within say a week they get the number. All numbers withing the range the database can handle are open from day one. So if you want a (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Allocation of member #'s
|
| Any opinions on how LUGNET member #'s should be allocated/assigned? Here are some possibilities: - One possibility is simply to start at 1 and count upward on a first- come, first-serve basis, one number at a time. (I think this might be what ICQ (...) (26 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
