To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 13763
13762  |  13764
Subject: 
Re: LUGNET Guide updates (Tue 14 Nov 2006)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:50:01 GMT
Viewed: 
1354 times
  
TWS Garrison wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Frank Filz wrote:
> 
> > LUGNET Server wrote:
> > > This is a daily report of recent changes made to the data in the
> > > <http://guide.lugnet.com/ LUGNET Guide>.
> > 
> > Hmm, do we really need these showing up in lugnet.admin.database?
> 
> Well, it's the best place I can think of for them, working from the
> assumption that lugnet.admin.database is the newsgroup for postings
> related to the LUGNET Guide.  That assumption is not actually
> supported by the charter but no existing newsgroup fits better and
> lugnet.admin.database has become the de facto LUGNET Guide
> addition/correction/comment posting area.  A new group such as
> lugnet.admin.database.lugnet might be appropriate, with generic or
> non-Guide postings kept in lugnet.admin.database. . .but really, it's
> in the .admin hierarchy, so it *should* be about LUGNET things like
> the Guide, and postings about databases not part of LUGNET should be
> in lugnet.database anyway.
> 
> If lugnet.admin.database is determined to be the best place for
> postings about the LUGNET Guide, then the Guide updates surely belong
> in it, since they are a) about the Guide and b) of interest to those
> interested in the Guide (or more precisely, the data in the
> Guide---certainly, they are of no interest to those interested in,
> e.g., the structure of the Guide, but not all the particular data
> that populates that structure).
> 
> > They never did before, and dramatically increase the traffic.
> 
> Well, since the twelfth of July this year, so for four months.
> 
> Is the increase in traffice positive?  Negative?  Neither?

It does make it harder to see posts from people providing updated
information. The log of updates is probably generally of minimal interest.
Having it available is nice, but I don't need to see it on a daily basis.

Of course, I've been a pretty slack data base updater, haven't made any
updates from the newsgroup in ages (I have made some updates from set boxes
as I catalog my collection).

Frank



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LUGNET Guide updates (Tue 14 Nov 2006)
 
(...) Well, it's the best place I can think of for them, working from the assumption that lugnet.admin.database is the newsgroup for postings related to the LUGNET Guide. That assumption is not actually supported by the charter but no existing (...) (20 years ago, 16-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general)

6 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Database

 
LUGNET Guide updates (Mon 12 Oct 2026)
23 hours ago

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR