 | | Re: Problem with Poll results page coding
|
|
(...) thanks for the kind words. I appreciate its not high on the list of priorities, the poll feature hasn't been used that much and the 5 or so years of Lugnet and I am probably the first person to include multiple pics for each choice. (although (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with Poll results page coding
|
|
(...) Oh my, that is messed up, isn't it? (*^.^*) Well, I can't fix this myself but I can tell you that the "twice displayed" thing was always there. Todd's choice. Ideally, there'd be more detailed viewing options. Perhaps one of the tech guys here (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Admin Resignation
|
|
(...) I agree. The post was informative and, as far as I can tell, accurate. The summary of problems is invaluable by providing an objective map of trouble spots moving forward. Although the team's work wasn't completely fruitful as originally (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Admin Resignation
|
|
(...) I'm also disappointed about the need for our resignations. It was done in the best interest of LUGNET and the community, though, and not really because of any personal animosity or anything. Having five people resign at once (although two had (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Problem with Poll results page coding
|
|
There seems to be a problem with the way the results page is coded. If you looks at this page, for example (URL) you can see that the content is displayed twice, once 'without pictures' and once with 'pictures' Apart from being a bit unnecessary, (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Admin Resignation
|
|
Kelly, I'm disappointed you resigned. However, I'm also rather disappointed [you] posted this rather divisive message... it smacks of attention seeking to me. I would have thought you and Frank were above this sort of thing. To be perfectly honest, (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Admin Resignation
|
|
(...) I would like to personally add my name to this. I respect what Suz and Todd have done very much. I love Lugnet, and I hope that it continues to be an important LEGO site. If anyone would like to contact me personally to talk more about why I (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET Admin Resignation
|
|
This note is from Kelly McKiernan, Larry Pieniazek, Lenny Hoffman, Tim Courtney, and Frank Filz. There's been a bit of conversation about the reasons behind these members discontinuing admin duties here at LUGNET. Rather than posting a huge (...) (19 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Admin stuff
|
|
(...) Thanks for coming forward with this offer, Paul! We should probably talk more, via e-mail or telephone, about what you might be able to do. I'm painfully busy right now, but do drop me a note so that we get something started. -Suz (19 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Legowiki
|
|
(...) Venkatesh, LUGNET is in the process of "future proofing" itself, so to speak. I'm in Boston having conversations with people and typing up potential directions for the site. Wiki integration is coming up often in my mind. Please contact me if (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Admin stuff
|
|
Hi, Suzanne & Todd... I'm member #115, and a member of BAYLUH / BAYLTC. Todd has met me a couple of times in person. I would like to offer assistance in whatever way you might need it to maintain LUGNET. (except financial, at the moment) If I can (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin changes
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, things are delayed. I got behind in my coursework and didn't make it to Boston yet. But I expect to be there in a few days. -Suz (19 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: admin changes
|
|
(...) I don't know. -Suz (19 years ago, 3-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: admin changes
|
|
"Suz" <suz@baseplate.com> wrote in message news:IHH3C8.Fxy@lugnet.com... (...) Strange that a post the server told me I had already posted still hasn't shown up after 6 hours, but here's the summary: Will your post give the current status and (...) (19 years ago, 3-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin changes
|
|
(...) No. I'm flying to Boston again tomorrow. Then writing a post for all which'll hopefully be up Monday. Thanks again for patience.. -Suz (19 years ago, 2-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: admin changes
|
|
(...) There are a few dots (URL) here>. (...) Whilst I'm sure we all agree that it's sad to see some of these guys standing down, it is clear that things were not working as well as they could. It is also evident that Suz and Todd do not have the (...) (19 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: admin changes
|
|
(...) Amen to that, brother! :-) <shakes head> Daves. Aren't they the wackiest? JOHN (19 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: admin changes
|
|
(...) That was too funny! Oh, man.... lol Haaa...aaahahahaha. man... :) -R (19 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: admin changes
|
|
Whoa. I can't say I expected to see this. Good luck to all the former admins and to those that remain as well. -Dave (19 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin changes
|
|
To quote Moe Szyslak, "Whaaa...aaa?????" What brought all this on? What are the implications for Lugnet? Thank you to all involved for their past and continuing service to the community. I know you've all worn a bunch of different hats, and please (...) (19 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
