|
|
 | | Re: LUGNET members association
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> We haven't really seen 'em, so how can we tell if they're incorrect? It's a matter of trust. Well, a prime minister of some country got on the telly last night and talked about (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET members association
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) Nicely said, Larry. However, wouldn't you agree that, in specific instances (especially as we've seen recently) that there needs to be debate, especially since if there's a perceived (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET members association
|
| (...) PS, that's just the sort of "picking at every word" (questioning "endless" when you know what was meant) that deters participation. (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) Possibly due to the perceived lack of faith from 'the community' towards the admin team in a few areas, such as, and this is one example--dealing with apparent transgressions in an (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET members association
|
| (...) Sorry, that was rhetoric. LUGNET is not infinite so there never has been an "endless" one. But there have been lots of interminable ones, don't you agree? (...) For a "made up" example The decision would be "person A gets a timeout of 48 hours (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
|
