 | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy —John VanZwieten
| | | | I was wondering what was taking Todd so long to reply (he usually pounces on questions directed his way) and now I see he was writing a thesis on the topic. Thanks for the in-depth response. The major reason I see for separating out parts and (...) (26 years ago, 3-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy —Jonathan Wilson
| | | | | i think that we should have a group for MOC's, a group for parts posts and a group for TLG sets. (26 years ago, 3-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy —John VanZwieten
| | | | | I agree, and I think cad.dat serves very well for MOC's. -John Van jonathan wilson wrote in message ... (...) (26 years ago, 8-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
