|
|
 | | Re: Do you think Lugnet Admin is a good job match for Larry?
|
| (...) it bad style). It seems some people are here more for the *discussion* than for the *subject of discussion* (Lego). If I were you, I'd remove that poll ASAP, and publish an apology. Your way is not the right one for calming a stormy sea. (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) I can agree with you that the level of communication has been rather low. In fact I'm almost getting withdrawal symptoms, as the 'signal-to-fight' ratio has gone so low. I *know* that Larry has done, and does, a *lot* of good work for the (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
| (...) Just to clarify, it was Lenny, in (URL) that posted the link here in lugnet, not Chris. -Rob A> (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) Now there's the pot calling the kettle black... :P Rob (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
| (...) Ok, Ok, I'll stop ragging on that one.. I just thought the phrase ' condensing and rude attitudes' was too hilarious to ignore... I'm sorry , I still can't think it without laughing. (...) Ok, I will acceed this point. True (...) True, I (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
