To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12434
12433  |  12435
Subject: 
Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 4 Mar 2005 06:35:42 GMT
Viewed: 
1037 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Mark Papenfuss wrote:
In lugnet.admin.general, Mark Papenfuss wrote:
In lugnet.admin.general, Kelly McKiernan wrote:


I can't wait to see the firestorm if/when LUGNET staff start editing posts
without permission :)

if/when?

Does Lugnet not view editing the FUT editing? This is widley done by the Admins.

I thought if you changed anything about a post than you were editing it. Am I
wrong in this assumption?

I would actually like an aswer to this. I would like to know what is and what is
not considered 'editing' by the Lugnet Admin team.

Well I dunno about any other editing, but I don't consider changing the FUT as
editing, as it is only a suggestion anyway. All they are changing is where
they'd like followups to go - you are still free to override that. And NNTP
admins have had that ability since the dawn of time. Well OK maybe the dawn of
NNTP time.

ROSCO



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
 
(...) I would actually like an aswer to this. I would like to know what is and what is not considered 'editing' by the Lugnet Admin team. M (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

21 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR