To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12308
12307  |  12309
Subject: 
Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:09:35 GMT
Viewed: 
679 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
If Lugnet has added 'no cursing' to the ToU for the expressed purpose of making
this site friendly to children, then the current method of limiting cursing is
seriously defunct.  People have, in the past, cursed and cursed a lot, and then
refused to request a cancel.  These posts are still viewable today - by children
or anyone who comes accross them.

Lugnet Admins should be given the power of:
1. Directly editting the posts of users without their consent.
2. Directly canceling the posts of users without their consent.
3. Suspending and/or banning users who repeatedly break the ToU.

If Lugnet wishes to maintain the spirit of no censoring, then it could follow
Ray Sander's advise - http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=50243 - and provide a
link to an unedited copy of the message.  A link that children would be advised
to avoid.

This would allow the Admins to be more immeadiate and complete in their attempt
to police Lugnet.  It would also be easier for users to obey the ToU, especially
when they remain ignorant of policy updates in .admin.general.  The whole
she-bang would flow a lot smoother.

I think this would make Lugnet a better place. And so I say "Please moderate
me!"

-Jason



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
 
(...) I second that, Jason. Lugnet is one of the last forums on the 'net where admins don't moderate posts directly. Fortunately, direct editing hasn't been needed often. But in some cases, it was needed. Ofcourse, asking the poster to do it himself (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Lugnet should be MORE draconian
 
I'm writing this as a user of Lugnet, not particularly as an Admin. I'm writing this way to get the reactions of other users in this concept. == If Lugnet has added 'no cursing' to the ToU for the expressed purpose of making this site friendly to (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)

21 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR