 | | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
Todd, since you responded, and this is your sandbox, I will respectfully withdraw the contests, out of regard for Lugnet. After all I do like the place. You have made your point clear and I will respect your wishes, this contest was of my own doing (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's
|
|
(...) Chris, why are you doing this? Why are you attempting to undermine LUGNET administration? What do you hope to gain by it? What do your friends in rtlToronto think of your antics? You think it's fun to run a contest that ridicules someone? (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
|
|
(...) Hear, hear! Tim and Stefan, I wholeheartedly concur. To become stressed out over little plastic bricks--however valuable they may be--is quite silly when you think about it. We all have our differences (sorry, that's just a "duh" statement) (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
|
(...) Dave, Does your complaint about whiners count as whining? Or is it only meta-whining? I'm easily confused. Mike (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
|
(...) word life, yo. D. (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
|
|
OK, maybe we really do need two different discussions to happen, but the two are inextricably intertwined. Filters would catch the slips and that'd be a Good Thing(TM). Admins then have to deal with the bad eggs who intentionally try to beat the (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
|
|
(...) It is a sad fact that people in the Western world are getting more and more stressed out, and the result is often bickering and whining in all kinds of situations which used to be a source for relaxation, all smiles and warm, fuzzy feelings. (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
|
|
The problem is that we're not dealing with momentary issues where someone mistypes or whatnot. Willy went out of his way to use a cuss, and then went out of his way to obfuscate the Admin's process of dealing with his cuss. A filter won't deal with (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
|
|
(...) Sadly the children tend to be the ones using the most unacceptable vernacular. (...) Yeah.. sure let the fox guard the henhouse. (...) As me Pappy used to say.. Sic' Em Boys! (...) I think we should give Lar a large Lego Bat to enforce the ToU (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Kelly McKiernan wrote: ?<snip> (...) I won't speak for others, but I believe that the admins have the right and responsibilty to enforce the ToU. It is, after all, your house--should your ToU in your house require all people (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
