|
|
 | | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
| (...) Looks like some spammer or script kiddie (or worm) figured out that LUGNET is a good domain to spoof return addresses from. It is very very unlikely (although not impossible, I suppose, but it would have to be something that works on Linux) (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
| (...) From I Wed Dec 1 00:19:32 2004 X-Apparently-To: janeyofthejungle@yah...SPAM0).com via 206.190.38.187; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:23:21 -0800 X-YahooFilteredBulk: 202.88.182.35 X-Originating-IP: [202.88.182.35] Return-Path: <i6w8e7.1c0p@lugnet.com> (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
| (...) 6 days ago I cleared my "spam" folder, and today there is a total of 9 pieces of spam, and 6 of them (one from each day) is this same user with the lugnet.com address, each mail has a different subject, and the attachment is slightly different (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: I love Lego
|
| !Wow, God, all the people who replied to this post are so defensive and protective of TLG. This is simply a personally statement of an individual who's valid concerns has caused him to express his feelings to TLG. This is directed to them...not you, (...) (20 years ago, 26-Nov-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.people, lugnet.general) !
| | | | | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
| (...) Yes, I am getting them as well, I get one a day with that lugnet.com addy, always with an attachment which I just assumed is a virus, so I have just deleted them. Janey "Red Brick" (20 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
| Has anyone else received an email with this address? I5zJ6s.rDJ@lugnet.com I got my fifth such email and all five have had some virus or worm in them. Thanks, Adr. (20 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Ten cheers for Jake
|
| (...) Yes, but LUGNET admins do not cancel user's posts without the direct consent of the User. This is stated policy as contained in the ToS - which you, as a User, should have read and understood. The User who used the "f-word" over twenty times (...) (20 years ago, 21-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Ten cheers for Jake
|
| Hello! (...) The issue is not the F-word itself in my as always more than humble opinion. It is just one syllable composed of three phonemes (the sounds /f/, /A/ and /k/) when you speak it out loud, using four graphemes (the letters 'f', 'u', 'c' (...) (20 years ago, 21-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
