| | Re: Are custom made parts LEGO? Dave Schuler
|
| | (...) Interesting that you truncated the group's title, and not a bad truncation at that! IMO formal clone *brands* should be generally confined to ot.clone-brands, but one-shot modifications are an artistic creation of their own and I agree with (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Are custom made parts LEGO? Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) It was a mistake, with no overt or covert subtheme to the truncation that I am aware of. Apologies for any confusion or false inferences drawn. (...) I truly hadn't thought about it. That may be too compartmentalised even for me. (...) Yes. (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Are custom made parts LEGO? Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | (...) even (...) or (...) we (...) seriously. (...) "Day 42: Today I beheaded a Jar-Jar in hopes that my cries will finally be heard at that wretched establishment called Lugnet. It's finally becoming clear to me that I should move onto larger and (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Happy day for Compartmentalised Dorks! (was Re: Are custom made parts LEGO? Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Put the Dremel(r) down, Rob, and back away from the table. These nice men are here to help you. They are going to take you to a place where you can talk about parts modding to your hearts content, and you won't have to hurt any more Jar-Jars (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Happy day for Compartmentalised Dorks! (was Re: Are custom made parts LEGO? Johannes Koehler
|
| | | | Hello! Hehe! I admit, having set FUT to an off-topic group has been a bit provocative. (...) That's a very good solution! Congrats! Bye Jojo (20 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |