Subject:
|
Re: "the community"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Feb 1999 14:41:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1048 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk (Jacob Sparre Andersen)
writes:
> Todd Lehman (lehman@javanet.com) wrote:
>
> > 2. Host the Usenet groups in a mapped location of the lugnet.* ng
> > hierarchy, for example:
> >
> > lugnet.usenet.alt.toys.lego
> > lugnet.usenet.fr.rec.jeux.lego
> > lugnet.usenet.rec.toys.lego
>
> Why not just:
>
> usenet.alt.toys.lego
> usenet.fr.jeux.lego
> usenet.rec.toys.lego
Well, that's certainly a possibility worth considering, but it goes against
the new URL system where the newsgroup names [will] be isomorphic with the
website URLs --
lugnet.x.y.z <==> http://www.lugnet.com/x/y/z/
> I hope you will make sure that people are made aware that
> (usenet.)alt.toys.lego is obsolete. Maybe by preventing
> people from posting to the group?
Yup, I'd make it read-only, for sure. :) Then I would cross my fingers and
hope that the benefits in making it readable at all here outweighed the
drawbacks of making it readable at all here. That is, any increase in ATL's
exposure/readership is indirect incentive for people to continue posting
there. It's a no-win situation...
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "the community"
|
| (...) Why not just: usenet.alt.toys.lego usenet.fr.jeux.lego usenet.rec.toys.lego I hope you will make sure that people are made aware that (usenet.)alt.toys.lego is obsolete. Maybe by preventing people from posting to the group? Play well, Jacob (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
