Subject:
|
Re: Web interface test
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Feb 1999 11:58:05 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@iwantnospam.ctp#IHateSpam#.com
|
Viewed:
|
743 times
|
| |
|
|
I owe a response and I will make one. Just need time to thorougly
outline what I did and did not do and what I saw.
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> In article lugnet.off-topic.test, lar@voyager.net (Larry Pieniazek) writes:
> > Duh, I never got a cookie. I think the setup should check for a cookie
> > even if you go in via the web interface.
> >
> > Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > >
> > > Why is my setup screen blank? It's as if it lost the cookie...
>
> Hey Lar, can you clarify a couple things? When you say "the setup should
> check for a cookie even if you go in via the web interface," what exactly do
> you mean by that (in terms of URLs if possible)? By "the setup" do you mean
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/news/post/setup/
>
> ?
>
> And by "...even if you go in via the web interface" -- the only way a cookie
> can ever be checked for is via the web interface.
>
> Also, are you accessing using
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/news/...
>
> or
>
> http://lugnet.com/news/...
>
> ?
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Web interface test
|
| (...) Hey Lar, can you clarify a couple things? When you say "the setup should check for a cookie even if you go in via the web interface," what exactly do you mean by that (in terms of URLs if possible)? By "the setup" do you mean (URL) by "...even (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
